🔗 Share this article

Based on a recent study of local authorities, English councils are planning to offload community centers, sports centres, and retail spaces as they bet on a rapid disposal of properties to balance the books.

Increasing Financial Pressures Prompt Asset Sales

A coalition of councils representing second-tier cities in the UK reported that 60% of councils are planning to dispose of properties to meet the rising costs of adult and children’s social care.

Local governments have in the past faced criticism for selling public land and land to shore up their finances, but they contend they must proceed to raise vital cash from asset sales or face insolvency.

The group noted that a high proportion of authorities seeking to raise money from a quick sale of assets represented “a clear change from 2024, when the majority (six in ten) of local leaders stated they would prioritise service redesigns and utilising savings to manage growing fiscal pressures.”

Detailed Cases of Planned Disposals

One local authority in southeast England said its property management strategy featured the disposal of a shopping centre in Rainham and a social club in Rochester to raise £20m over five years.

• A local golf course and business parks owned in Worcestershire and Suffolk, which all provide rental income for the authority, will also be sold under the plan.

Council Tax Increases and Wider Fiscal Pressures

This research of local authorities in the coalition, which includes Sunderland, Southampton, Gloucester and Salford, further found that more than 70% of councils will have to increase local levies next April to address the growing cost of essential services, higher levels of housing insecurity, and a longstanding accommodation deficit.

Medway council explained it will press ahead with property disposals after steep rises in the cost of children services, special educational needs and disability (Send) provision, adult social care, and short-term housing.

“We are taking innovative approaches but certain measures take time to deliver both improved services and cost efficiency,” stated Vince Maple.

He added: “There are population challenges which will persist to add to the pressures we have. As a unitary authority, we had a 91% cut in our central funding from 2010-24, which is extremely difficult.”

National Patterns and Projections

Research of regional authorities recently further found council budgets being stretched by the increasing figures of young people and older individuals needing Send support.

The County Councils Network said that council deficits will hit 4.4 billion pounds a year by the end of the decade, as they grapple to cope with rising needs.

Government officials have put off scheduled changes to the Send system until the coming year after a policy document setting out those changes has been postponed.

Disadvantage and Funding Shortfalls

According to the latest deprivation measures (IMD) covering English councils, several participating urban areas were included in the most deprived in the country.

• “Participating urban centers like Hull, Bradford, Stoke-on-Trent, Sunderland and Wolverhampton place in the top 30 nationally under the 2025 deprivation indices,” said the study.

“Although only one key city is among the top 10 for disadvantaged communities nationally, urban areas are far more likely to be in the most deprived fifth of the nation. The figures underscores the scale of difficulties facing municipal officials across key cities in the next twelve months,” the analysis concluded.

“Local government leaders have been explicit about the need for a equitable and lasting funding system that reflects and addresses the actual extent of disadvantage and demand,” said a council leader.

“Lacking this, local authorities will persist to face difficult decisions around which essential services to allocate spend to, and which to cut, to the detriment of their communities.”

One in five of local authorities have cut or compromised social care provision in the last year, the survey found.