🔗 Share this article

A decade following the UK entered into a hasty referendum that divided the country and unleashed chaos, a advisory is issued from beyond the Irish Sea: it may occur once more.

Authorities and voters drifted into Brexit and the identical might transpire with a national vote on a united Ireland, sparking disturbances for which nobody is prepared.

That conveys the caution from two leading writers from both sides of the Irish border who have teamed up to examine the pros and cons of Northern Ireland leaving the UK to create a fresh nation with the Republic of Ireland.

Political Establishments Not Ready

The author and columnist and The Northern Ireland editor, have determined that the administrative systems in Ireland and Britain are woefully ill-prepared for a possibly contentious and seismic public vote.

"The lesson of Brexit hasn't been learned, which is that developments can come out of the blue and can gain traction swiftly," O’Toole stated. "I would suggest that the governmental framework of our region remains very unstable."

New Title Aims to Provoke Discussion

The team have studied the governmental, financial and cultural rationales for any structural alteration in a volume, For and Against a United Ireland, issued by the Irish Royal Irish Academy.

They aim to provoke discussion on the topic with a roadshow of lectures that will take them to Westminster soon.

"What haunts all parties, or should haunt everybody, is the Brexit vote of 2016," said O’Toole.

"We should prevent a national vote on a thumbs up-thumbs down, vague proposition whose implications have not been spelled out because then you land with an extraordinarily divided society where people who have lost are not reconciled to defeat and the those successful are uncertain exactly what it is that they have achieved."

Legal Framework

Under the Good Friday agreement, the Northern Ireland official is obliged to schedule a referendum on Irish unification if it seems probable that a majority would approve.

Sinn Féin and other nationalists claim this point is imminent, and a non-profit named Ireland’s Future has rallied support, but authorities in Dublin and London and pro-UK factions downplay the prospect, leaving it unclear whether or when there might be a national vote.

Insufficient Informed Dialogue

Ideological statements supporting and opposing unification has obscured the lack of substantive discussion, said McBride.

"Individuals are often supportive or opposed the notion but the concrete planning which may surpass that to realise it is mostly absent. A lot has gone on in universities but hardly any elected officials or activists are willing to participate with even the basics. As an example, which kind of country would you want? Centralised? Decentralised?"

Book's Approach

In the volume, none of the commentators advocates unity or the current situation. Each authors two essays that aim for neutrality in detailing the rationale for a united Ireland and the rationale against, gathering financial and social figures, historical precedents and constitutional models.

Debates cover national emblems, levies, healthcare systems, elderly benefits, sovereign debt obligations and the risk of unionist unrest. The aim is to educate and provoke dialogue.

"Considerable attention exists in the topic but there has not yet occurred a debate," commented the writer. "Debate indicates an recognition of the idea that there might be valid points on each side."

Parallel Votes

A referendum in Northern Ireland would also trigger one in the republic, where voters claim they support unification but reject increased taxation or adopting a alternative symbol to recognise unionists' UK heritage.

"Authorities in Dublin should establish what the offer from nationalist groups is beyond just declaring: 'We seek a unified Ireland and we love you'," stated the commentator.

Likelihood of Public Vote

McBride believes a national vote in his era is probable and that it may take place unexpectedly. "There might be just a mad or a bad or a incompetent secretary of state who says: 'We should proceed and settle the matter.'"

Both nationalists and pro-UK supporters have reasonable, legitimate points, he said. "Somebody will prevail in this matter and the other side will ultimately not succeed but all factions has has something to gain from the other's viewpoints."

Call for Wider Discussion

Westminster must engage with the discussion, stated O’Toole. "This is about Britain. It's a British issue as much as it is an Irish issue."